Multi Store Model And Levels Of Processing Psychology Essay

Multi Store regulate And Levels Of Processing psychology adjudicateDuring this grant the recollection works that allow for be compargond atomic number 18 Attkinson and Shiffrins (1970) multi- introduce model and Craik and Lockharts (1972) Levels of processing. We will not that be comparing the depot models only when everywhe desire evaluating and looking at the opposing studies. The case studies and theorists that are looked at develop very supportive and detailed views although not all studies will be necessarily correct or wrong. Through out this assignment the research and studies are establish on studies from Milner (1970), Atkinson and Shiffrins Multi- break in model (1970), Craik and Lockharts (1972), Craik and Tulvings (1975) and Morrison (1985). Although the studies and theories are based on research that was completed and evaluated over 40 historic period a go we can look and see how it has affected us through every day life.The case ingest, HM Milner (1970 ) supports the views that on that point is much than nonpareil pedigree for memory. HM suffered brain damage due to surgery. after(prenominal)ward the surgery, HM was left with normal short bound memory and only few memories from before the operation (which he had in order to give trend seizures). HM was now unable to create new long call memories, which suggests that short name memory is separate too long barrier memory and is not one store. This shows that HM was unable to encode and transport info, from short verge memory to long name memory.This provides support for the multi- store model.Craik and Lockhart (1972) were not in full agreement for the multi- store model. Craik and Lockhart had a surmise that the levels of processing were more complex and depended on how the information was given to how we would opine information back at later dates and quantify. They believed it wasnt just how many another(prenominal) times it was repeated and rehearsed but how the information is being given as in that location are many levels of processing Shallow/structural level opthalmic/ how something looks Intermediate/ phonetic level- the sound or way something is said copious/ semantic the meaning or the connection to the subject(AQA Psychology B Nelson Thornes page 172)The reconstructive model was to as well as prove our long term memory and short-term memory were not separate stores. This model in any case provides support for levels of processing theory (Bartlett 1932).Milners (1970) case study supports the Multi- store Model because they found that there are three overall stores (Sensory store, Long term memory and Short- term memory) which likewise exigencyed the processes and stages of memory ( convert, storage and retrieval). The memory stores and processes of memory, together make Attkinson and Shiffrins (1970) multi- store model very useful and supportive.Craik and Tulvings (1975) study also supports the theory of levels of proces sing. They found that there are three several(predicate) types of encoding (semantic, acoustic and visual) which showed us after the study took place, that semantic encoding which is a incomprehensibleer thinking process, was a more useful and effective way of remembering information. As the experiment was conducted, there were three basic rules Participants were shown 60 manner of speaking One at a time They all had one give-and-take at each level (semantic, visual and acoustic) altogether of the volumes had to fit in to a sentence be of upper or lower case or Asked if they rhymed. After the experiment a disceptation was given to the participants with all 60 words, plus an additional 120. The participants were asked to recognise the skipper words. This experiment was to prove how rehearsal was more important that Attkinson and Shiffrins (1970) simplistic multi- store model actually was. (AQA Psychology B Nelson Thornes page 174).Although twain of these studies debate again st each different, they both have three stages and show different shipway to unsay information for long term memory and short term memory in different detail. Morrison (1985) created a study, making up insincere football results to a handful of people, to see how participants with and without interest would remember and recall information powerful. The study found that people with interest recalled the most results correctly even though they were false. These results contradicted the multi- store model. Tyler (1979) also created a study that contradictory against the levels of processing theory. The study showed us that the recall on harder words was high than the recall on easier words (essential AS Psychology Richard Geoff and Geoff Rolls AS mental faculty 1 page 9-12)Attkinson and Shiffrin (1971) Multi- store model suggests the capacity, duration and encoding are the key points to the short term memory and long term memory, where as the reconstructive model and levels of processing (Craik and Lockhart 1972) believe it is not just how profoundly processed and relevant the word(s) are. The rehearsal is crucial for the transformation of information from short-term memory to long term memory, where as the reconstructive model shows us semantic (rhyming words/questions) and shallow processing (case questions/answers) arte how we store information based on short term memory and long term memory is one store, unlike levels of processing suggests.Our long term and short term and short term memory is used every day without realising it. It affects the forest and how we behave for every human and animal. Elizabeth Loftus 1974) constructed an experiment to see how reliable an witness testimony actually was. A video was shown to a bunch of participants, of a car accident. After viewing the video half were asked what they saw, using the word smashed, Whilst the other half had the word hit in the sentence. They were also asked to create verbally down the spee d of the car in their opinion. More people with the word smashed in the sentence, said they saw broken glass. in that location was also an average speed of 41 miles per hour when smashed was used the other half estimated an average of 34 miles per hour when hearing the word hit.Ley (1978) also experimented how reliable remembrance was, by conducting a study on visit the doctors. 10 per cent of doctors patients remembered what was said after he wrote a cusp for doctors on how to give advice. As the first result showed only patients with checkup background remembered over half, where as patients without did not remember as much. (Discovering Psychology Barbra Woods page 120-121)All of these studies have affected the way in which questionnaires and eye witness testimonies are now conducted. There are many factors that can affect on how we remember information and our environmental side can also affect our recall. This could also be proven to be a flashbulb memory. This is when an i ndividual remembers an incident or memo9ry when it relates to something i.e. millennium, new family (December 1999- January 2000) you will remember certain things about that particular moment (where you were? What you wore? Who you were with?) There are many things that contradict levels of processing and the multi- store memory.There are a lot of reliable studies to prove memory models and theories but there are some things that can not actually prove how deep we process information or how much we can process over many years. Block and organisation helps us to process and retain information easier although effort is needed. Distinctiveness makes the information unique. Along with elaboration which allows us to plump out information. (Essential AS Psychology Richard Gross and Geoff Rolls AS Module 1 scalawag 13)We cannot also prove why rehearsal is sometimes not needed, it is also described as a two-way flow of information i.e. Morris (1985) the multi- store model is also seen as to simplistic as it doesnt always exchange to long term memory from short term memory, even after rehearsal.In conclusion throughout this comparison of models we have compared analysed and researched different studies. All studies put forward strong and supportive evidence for each, even though most oppose against each other. The multi- store model and the levels of processing studies both have positive outcomes. They have both helped us to realise we cannot rely on eyewitness testimonies and have helped people on giving intimate that is comprehensible and understandable. So to conclude, this assignment shows us how different studies can be correct but are not necessarily wrong. All of the studies need to be researched more today to be able to carry on in supporting all views as the memory models will keep up to be compared.AQA Psychology B Nelson Thornes 1988PSYCHOLOGY for AS LEVEL Michael W. EYSENCK and CARA FLANAGAN 2000 inseparable AS Psychology Richard Gross and Geoff Rolls Discovering psychology BARBRA WOODS